Preferred Scientific Name
Azolla pinnata
Preferred Common Name
mosquito fern
International Common Names
English: African azolla; feathered mosquito fern; ferny azolla; pinnate mosquito fern; water velvet
Local Common Names
Australia: red azolla; red water fern; water moss
Germany: Afrikanischer Algenfarn; Gefiederter Algenfarn
Japan: aka-ukikusa
Vietnam: beo-dau
Summary of Invasiveness
pinnata can spread very quickly forming dense vegetative masses on areas of still water. This in turn limits the light available to other aquatic plants and oxygen used by other aquatic life. In New Zealand it has had a detrimental impact on the native species A. rubra (Owen, 1997). It is included on the federal noxious weed list for the USA (USDA-NRCS, 2004).
Distribution
Azolla pinnata is locally distributed in its native range of Africa and Madagascar, India, Southeast Asia, China and Japan, Malaysia and the Philippines, the New Guinea mainland and Australia (Croft, 1986). The native ranges of the three subspecies is given in USDA-ARS (2005) as: tropical Africa, southern Africa and Madagascar for subsp. africana; tropical Asia, China and Japan for subsp. asiatica; and Australia and New Caledonia for subsp. pinnata.
Distribution Table and Maps
The distribution in the summary table and maps below is based on all the information available, as listed in the ISC.
Country | Distribution | Origin | Invasive | References |
ASIA | ||||
Bangladesh | Restricted distribution | Native | Shahjahan et al., 1980; EPPO, 2014 | |
Brunei Darussalam | Present | Waterhouse, 1993 | ||
Cambodia | Restricted distribution | Waterhouse, 1993; EPPO, 2014 | ||
China | Restricted distribution | Native | Croft, 1986; EPPO, 2014 | |
-Anhui | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
-Fujian | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
-Henan | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
-Hubei | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
-Jiangsu | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
-Jiangxi | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
-Sichuan | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
-Zhejiang | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
India | Restricted distribution | EPPO, 2014 | ||
-Assam | Widespread | Native | Devashish & Kar Barbhuiya, 2001 | |
-Bihar | Widespread | Native | Srivastava & Amarjeet Singh, 1984 | |
-Gujarat | Widespread | Native | Sreenivas & Rana, 1992 | |
-Jammu and Kashmir | Widespread | Native | Dutta et al., 1991 | |
-Kerala | Widespread | Native | Thomas, 1976; Madhusoodanan et al., 1993 | |
-Odisha | Present | Native | Satapathy & Chand, 1984 | |
Indonesia | Restricted distribution | Waterhouse, 1993; USDA-ARS, 2005; EPPO, 2014 | ||
Japan | Restricted distribution | Native | Croft, 1986 | |
Korea, DPR | Restricted distribution | Dostálek et al., 1989 | ||
Laos | Present | Waterhouse, 1993 | ||
Malaysia | Restricted distribution | Native | Waterhouse, 1993; Mansor & Sam, 1992 | |
Myanmar | Present | Waterhouse, 1993; USDA-ARS, 2005 | ||
Pakistan | Restricted distribution | USDA-ARS, 2005; EPPO, 2014 | ||
Philippines | Restricted distribution | Native | Bravo, 1991; Waterhouse, 1993; EPPO, 2014 | |
Sri Lanka | Restricted distribution | Native | Weerakoon & Gunewardena, 1983 | |
Taiwan | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
Thailand | Restricted distribution | Native | Takara, 1981; Waterhouse, 1993; EPPO, 2014 | |
Vietnam | Restricted distribution | Native | Waterhouse, 1993; Thuoc et al., 1978; Croft, 1986;EPPO, 2014 | |
AFRICA | ||||
Angola | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963; Exell & Wild, 1960 | |
Botswana | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963; EPPO, 2014 | |
Burundi | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963 | |
Cameroon | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963 | |
Central African Republic | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963 | |
Congo | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963 | |
Congo Democratic Republic | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963; Exell & Wild, 1960; EPPO, 2014 | |
Côte d’Ivoire | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963 | |
Egypt | Restricted distribution | Native | Galal & El-Ghandour, 2000 | |
Gabon | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963 | |
Guinea | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963 | |
Guinea-Bissau | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963 | |
Kenya | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963; Johns, 1991 | |
Liberia | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963; Johns, 1991 | |
Madagascar | Restricted distribution | Native | Johns, 1991; EPPO, 2014 | |
Mozambique | Restricted distribution | Native | Johns, 1991 | |
Nigeria | Restricted distribution | Native | Johns, 1991 | |
Rwanda | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963; Johns, 1991 | |
Senegal | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963; Johns, 1991 | |
Sierra Leone | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963 | |
South Africa | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963; Hill, 1998; Johns, 1991 | |
Tanzania | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963 | |
Uganda | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963; Johns, 1991 | |
Zambia | Restricted distribution | Native | Dyer et al., 1963; Johns, 1991 | |
OCEANIA | ||||
Australia | Restricted distribution | Native | Croft, 1986; EPPO, 2014 | |
-Australian Northern Territory | Restricted distribution | Native | Chapman et al., 1981; USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
-New South Wales | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
-Queensland | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
-Victoria | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
New Caledonia | Present | Native | USDA-ARS, 2005 | |
New Zealand | Restricted distribution | Introduced | Invasive | Owen, 1997; EPPO, 2014 |
Papua New Guinea | Restricted distribution | Native | Croft, 1985; Croft, 1986 |
History of Introduction and Spread
Introductions to new countries are assumed to have been through horticultural or ornamental trade with the aquarium industry.
Risk of Introduction
There is a low risk of spread to non-tropical and sub-tropical areas, and spread between waterbodies within natural areas appears to be regulated by deliberate introduction by man for agricultural purposes. Once in a waterbody, vegetative fragments and spores can spread easily downstream, and be carried with floodwaters to colonize new areas.
Notes on Natural Enemies
Calilung and Lit (1986) reported studies on a broad range of insect fauna associated with Azolla in the Philippines, with several species causing frond damage to several Azolla species. It was suggested that herbivory prevented Azolla species from becoming weeds in rice paddies.
Dath and Singh (1998) reported that A. pinnata was very susceptible to the fungus Rhizoctonia solani [Thanatephorus cucumeris], and Shahjahan et al. (1980) reported inhibition of growth of A. pinnata by Sclerotium rolfsii [Corticium rolfsii] and Rhizoctonia sp. These fungal pathogens are opportunists and also attack a range of crop plants. Fannah (1987) reported a completed life cycle of Elophila africalis on A. pinnata in Sierra Leone which was followed up by Roberts et al. (1998).
Sands and Kassulke (1986) reported oviposition by females of Paulinia acuminata after feeding on A. pinnata. However, P. acuminata was introduced into Africa, India and Fiji for the control of Salvinia molesta but is not host specific and did not contribute significantly to control (Julien and Griffiths, 1998). Therefore, it is unlikely that it is an important constraint on A. pinnata.
The frond-feeding weevil Stenopelmus rufinasus was imported into quarantine for testing as a potential natural enemy for the A. filiculoides in South Africa (Hill, 1998). Both the adults and larvae severely reduced A. filiculoides in the laboratory.
Of 31 plant species in 19 families tested, adult feeding, oviposition and larval development were only recorded on the Azolla species (A. filiculoides, A. pinnata subsp. poss. asiatica, A. pinnata subsp. africana and A. nilotica). A. filiculoides was the most suitable host for the weevil. Low adult emergence from A. nilotica and A. pinnata subsp. africana would probably prevent the weevil from establishing on them in the field. A. pinnata subsp. poss. asiatica supported greater development. Impact
The presence of A. pinnata on the US federal Noxious Weeds List implies there is a risk of significant economic impact from this species. There are no data on actual costs to activities restricted by the presence of this species, although it will interfere with navigation, boating, irrigation, recreation, angling and bathing, and there will be costs associated with control.
References
Basak B, Pramanik AH, Rahman MS, 2002. Azolla (Azolla pinnata) as a feed ingredient in broiler ration. International Journal of Poultry Science 1:29-34.
Croft JR, 1985. Ferns and Fern Allies. In: Leach GJ, Osborne PL, eds. Freshwater Plants of Papua New Guinea. University of Papua New Guinea, 33-74.
Croft JR, 1986. The aquatic Pteridophytes of New Guinea. Australian National Herbarium, Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research.http://www.anbg.gov.au/projects/fern/aquatic/.
EPPO, 2014. PQR database. Paris, France: European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization.http://www.eppo.int/DATABASES/pqr/pqr.htm
Exell AW, Wild H, 1960. Flora Zambesiaca, Vol. 1. London, UK: Crown Agents for Oversea Governments and Administrations.
Gopal GV, 2000. Azolla pinnata r.br. Pteridophyte; Salviniales (Azollaceae) in the management of lake agro ecosystem. In: Ramachandra TV, Rajasekara Murthy C, Nhalya, N, eds. Proceedings of Lake 2000. International Symposium on Restoration of Lakes and Wetlands, 27th to 29th November 2000, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. India.
Hall JW, 1969. Studies on fossil Azolla. American Journal of Botany, 56:1173-1180.
Hossain M, Ahmad MU, Ahmed N, Hossain MA, Alim MA, 2002. A study on control of root knot nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) of wheat. Indian Agriculturist, 46:121-128.
Johns RJ, 1991. Pteridophytes of Tropical East Africa. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens.
Kaur H, 2001. Biomass production of Azolla pinnata R. BR. in contaminated soils of Punjab (India). 5th International Biomass Conference of the Americas, Florida 2001.
Knouse JA, 1997. Genus Azolla: the mosquito ferns. http://www.jaknouse.athens.oh.us/ferns/g_azol.html#top.
Konar RN, Kapoor RK, 1974. Anatomical studies on Azolla pinnata. Phytomorphology, 22:211-223.
Konar RN, Kapoor RK, 1975. Embryology of Azolla pinnata. Phytomorphology, 24:228-261.
Loyal DS, 1974. Chromosome size and structure in some heterosporous ferns with a bearing on evolutionary problems. In: Kachroo P, ed. Advancing Frontiers in Cytogenetics, 293-298.
Loyal DS, Gollen AK, Ratra R, 1982. Morphological and cytotaxonomic observations on Azolla pinnata. Fern Gazette, 12:230-232.
Moore AW, 1969. Azolla: biology and agronomic significance. Botanical Review, 35:17-35.
Owen SJ, 1997. Ecological weeds on conservation land in New Zealand: a database. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Conservation.
Reed CF, 1965. Distribution of Salvinia and Azolla in South America and Africa in connection with studies for control by insects. Phytologia, 12:121-130.
Satapathy KB, Chand PK, 1984. Studies on the ecology of Azolla pinnata R. Br. of Orissa. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society, 63:44-52.
Thuoc NH, Tinh NH, Nhu DX, Thong NW, Thach HN, 1978. Anh huo’ng cua anh sang va nhiet do den sinh truong va quang hop cua beo dau. (Vliyanie sveta i temperatury na rost i fotosintez Azolla pinnata.) Khoa Hoc va Kythuat Nong Napier, 2:91-95.
USDA-ARS, 2005. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN). Online Database. National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, USA. http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/tax_search.pl.
USDA-NRCS, 2004. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5. Baton Rouge, USA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov.
Wall H, 1994. Water Facts – Control of Azolla (Red Water Fern). Queensland, Australia: Rural Water Advisory Services, Department of Natural Resources.